• Home
  • Economy
  • Charles Asubonten v. Susan Webber: Filed in Maryland in July 2023, Dismissed February 2024
Image

Charles Asubonten v. Susan Webber: Filed in Maryland in July 2023, Dismissed February 2024


Below are the major filings and order in Charles Asubonten v. Susan Webber, which was dismissed February 2024 for failure to make service. We remain extremely grateful for the vigorous and highly expert defense by Cuneo Gilbert Flannery & LaDuca in Washington DC, with Mike Smith (now retired) leading our case.

Please bear in mind the request we made on our post on the new case, Charles Asubonten v. Aurora Advisors Incorporated and Susan Webber:

Comments are turned off for this post and will be for all other posts with later filings from this case and from the earlier cases. Please do not waste your time trying to discuss these cases on other posts. We have set up ample measures to assure these comments will not appear.

As much as I would normally very much enjoy reader reactions and expressions of sympathy, please also do not e-mail me about these cases. Any such messages will be deleted unread.

If you want to help:

Please read the filings

Please circulate the posts widely, particularly to those who might be interested in learning about top-notch litigators, Greg Brockwell of Brockwell Smith in Birmingham, Alabama and Charles LaDuca and Brendan Thompson of Cuneo Gilbert Flannery & LaDuca in Washington DC. Mike Smith of Cuneo, to whom we will remain forever grateful for his patience, relentlessness, and careful investigation and drafting, has retired.

Please visit the Tip Jar

The Asubonten Complaint:

00 Asubonten v. Webber Comlaint July 2023
 

The Asubonten Amended Complaint:

00 Asubonten v. Webber Amdended Compliant_compressed
 

The Cuneo Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Amended Compliant. For those who would like to understand what this (and the later case against Aurora Advisors Incorporated) were about without reading all the pleadings, the Asubonten complaints above and this document cover most of the arguments made in the later Aurora litigation in Maryland. Having said that, the Asubonten filings against Aurora were more detailed on a factual assertions and case citation basis, so the legally-minded might enjoy reading Cuneo’s later, more extensive refutations as well.

00 2023.12.26 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint
 

The District Court order dismissing the case in February 2024:

00 Dismissal Order C13CV23550
 

The docket, for the legally-minded to see the additional legal arm-wrestling on this case:

00 howard docket sheet_compressed

Print Friendly, PDF & Email



Source link

Releated Posts

A Plea for Reason from a Recovering Extrovert

Yves here. We seem to be in a odd gears-changing period, where there is a lot of news…

ByByNews on SantoshHub Nov 12, 2026

Satyajit Das: Chronicle of A Financial Crisis Foretold – Part 1

Yves here. We are delighted to post a mini-series that recaps some of the main points of an…

ByByNews on SantoshHub Nov 12, 2026

Who Benefits From the Nvidia Scandal Revelations?

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang admitted to having an affair with an alleged Chinese spy, and some are questioning…

ByByNews on SantoshHub Nov 12, 2026

Michael Hudson: Hilarious IMF Demand on Ukraine

Yves here. To invoke a favorite Michael Hudson observation, “Debts that can’t be paid, won’t be paid.” The…

ByByNews on SantoshHub Nov 11, 2026

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top