• Home
  • Economy
  • How Anti-Worker Lawmakers Are Trying to Muzzle Voters
Image

How Anti-Worker Lawmakers Are Trying to Muzzle Voters


Conor here: The following piece from hits all the right notes in its criticisms of GOP anti-labor agenda. That’s fair; the Republicans are certainly no friend of the working class.

Yet, I’d be much more interested in what she has to say about the other side of the aisle, with which union leadership marches lockstep despite their hostility toward the working class, and that same union leadership which is increasingly out of sync with membership and is abdicating their duties during a crackdown on what the administration describes as the “anti-capitalism terrorism.” Any functioning labor movement would be grinding the country and its sputtering “arsenal of democracy” to a halt in the face of a such an assault —or have done so long ago at some point during the decades-long neoliberal march. Instead it’s business as usual with the same tired bromides.

If you missed the news about the American Federation of Labor – Congress of Industrial Organizations, (AFL-CIO) 30th Convention in Minneapolis last month, that’s hardly surprising. Not much of a peep came out of it despite our burgeoning police state paving the way for a return to serfdom. In fact, union leadership seemed more concerned with disappearing for an extended vacation.

Little do they have to say about union membership that hovers around ten percent in the overall workforce —and about half that in the private sector— or the global war agenda pursued by Trump and the majority of the Democrat establishment despite its goals of a global Zionist-capitalist authoritarianism devastating for labor. Instead, here’s Chris Townsend, a 47-year union member and leader who currently serves on the Executive Committee of the International Workers Institute, on the AFL-CIO’s disappearing act:

The single notable and astonishing item buried in plain sight was “Constitutional Amendment Number 1”. Promulgated prior to the Convention, embraced by the Executive Council leaders in secret, and then hurriedly run past the delegates, this remarkable amendment to the AFL-CIO Constitution sets in stone that the next convention will be delayed until 2031, a full five years away. Given the emergency nature of the assaults landing on workers and the unions, and in view of the incredibly urgent need for labor’s “general staff” to meet even more frequently than has been the norm, the delay of the next Convention for nearly 5 years is an appalling act of treachery and misleadership, to put it mildly.

The Amendment was pitched as a sort-of ordinary “housekeeping” measure, presumably to align the next Convention dates with odd numbered years every 4 years, as had been the custom. That being noted, it is astonishing given the urgent and dangerous conditions in which all labor and AFL-CIO affiliates currently function, that it seemed acceptable to extend out the next Convention a full 5 years!

The actual significance of the quick move is more sinister. All democratic norms have been suspended by a Federation already addled by its lack of democratic processes, and this acts to protect those already “re-elected” in the sham election just conducted. The Convention is ultimately the highest body of the Federation, and the apparent lack of opposition to this power-grab by Shuler and Redmond – and whoever emerges as the backroom choice to replace Redmond – from the affiliate union leaders is perhaps not shocking, but no less staggering in its significance. None of the “decisions” made at the just concluded Convention will face any scrutiny until 2031. The virtually unknown Executive Council members will continue to “lead” the Federation from their secret sessions. Shuler will be left unquestioned to preside over another 5 years of drift, decay, demoralization, and subordination to the Democratic Party…

The mummification of the AFL-CIO, and its end as an effective and relevant force for progress is nearly complete. Those pieces as yet not subject to the embalming process will by 2031 be completely mummified, as the just concluded 30th AFL-CIO Convention has decided. While expectations for the recent Convention were low, in fact very low, it is still remarkable that the sitting leadership of the majority of the U.S. labor movement has seen fit to lay out such an uninspiring strategy at this moment, of all moments.

By Roxanne D. Brown, the international president of the United Steelworkers Union (USW), which is an affiliate of the AFL-CIO. This article was originally produced by the Independent Media Institute.

Missouri’s Republican lawmakers did exactly what their corporate patrons demanded in 2017 and rammed through legislation intended to prevent working people from banding together to fight for better lives.

This gift to the ultra-wealthy prompted a furious backlash, with members of the United Steelworkers (USW) and other Missourians turning out in force in 2018 to pass a citizen-driven referendum overturning the odious law.

You might have expected the corporate loyalists in the General Assembly to be humbled by this stinging rebuke. You might even have thought that the errant legislators would correct course and start doing their jobs the right way after being dealt such a blow.

But no, they’re now doubling down and trying to rig the system so that it’s much more difficult for the pesky voters to weigh in from now on. They want to raise the threshold for passing a citizen-initiated constitutional amendment, from a majority of votes statewide to a majority in every single congressional district, meaning a tiny group of naysayers could scuttle a proposal favored by everyone else.

Thwarting referendums in this way means usurping the will of the people, but it’s all just another day at the office for a growing number of anti-worker lawmakers around the country. Their message to voters: Shut your mouths or we’ll shut them for you.

It’s important to remember that we have a fundamental right to petition and redress the government—and that includes gathering enough signatures to put an issue on the ballot and then throwing the matter in front of the entire electorate for a yes-or-no decision. The referendum enables us to take the wheel, especially when our elected representatives fail to do what’s right or act against our interests.

Speaking of which, Missouri Republicans remain angry about the 2018 rollback of their falsely named “right-to-work” law, aimed at diluting worker power, decimating unions, and deepening corporate control.

The USW and other pro-worker organizations gathered hundreds of thousands of signatures—far more than the number required—to force a referendum challenging the anti-worker measure. Then we put boots on the ground, mobilizing our activists in a door-to-door outreach effort that drove voters to the polls and killed the law before it even took effect.

But the pro-worker advocacy didn’t stop there.

Buoyed by that success, union members and other activists pushed through other referendums, including a commonsense measure in 2024 providing paid sick leave that Missouri workers need to care for themselves and sick loved ones.

This made the Republican legislators angrier than before. They promptly rescinded the paid sick leave requirement, saying they knew better than the voters.

Now, by trying to obstruct the referendum process, the same lawmakers want to silence voters and solidify their own control. It’s the only way they can advance an agenda that benefits the rich even as working people struggle to make ends meet.

Even worse, Republicans in other states mounted their own attacks on voters. Here are a few examples:

  • After Oklahomans approved a referendum expanding Medicaid, the Republican legislature and governor retaliated in 2025 with a law making it more difficult to gather the signatures required for future ballot initiatives. From here on out, supporters may collect only a certain number of signatures in each county, denying a voice to millions of voters statewide.
  • Republicans in South Dakota passed a law in 2025 shortening the signature-gathering period to make the process more cumbersome and kill off as many ballot initiatives as possible. They’re back at it in 2026, trying to jack up the threshold for passing constitutional amendments to 60 percent of votes cast instead of the simple majority currently required.
  • No one’s gone further to muzzle voters than the Republican lawmakers and governor in Florida, who authorized astronomical fees to “validate” every signature that’s collected to get a referendum on the ballot. This farcical requirement dooms many initiatives from the get-go, just as they intended.

Make no mistake, USW members and our allies fight these assaults on our rights.

For example, the Republicans in Missouri can only enact their restrictive changes to the citizen-driven process if the voters approve them—in a referendum, ironically—in August.

USW activists have hit the streets to educate voters about the stakes and to generate the turnout needed to bury this proposal for good.

That’s only one battleground. A federal court in Arkansas just sided with voters who sued over absurd restrictions on ballot initiatives in that state. And USW members and other voters in Ohio stopped lawmakers cold when they tried to kill referendums there a few years ago.

Sooner or later, anti-worker lawmakers will learn that there’s no silencing voters like us. The harder they try, the louder we get.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email



Source link

Releated Posts

Policy Uncertainty Spikes around New Section 301 Tariffs

EPU and Trade Policy Uncertainty: Figure 1: Economic Policy Uncertainty (blue, left scale), 7 day centered moving average…

ByByNews on SantoshHub Jul 25, 2026

Links 7/25/2026 | naked capitalism

Dear patient readers, In lieu of an Iran war post, you are getting extra Links with an Iran…

ByByNews on SantoshHub Jul 25, 2026

How Technology Is Rewriting the Way We Write

Yves here. On the one hand, it may seem intuitive that writing by hand would require more concentration…

ByByNews on SantoshHub Jul 25, 2026

Humanity and Nature Through Social Production: Marx’s Materialism Unfolded from Epicurus

Yves here. This is an intriguing discussion of the influences on some core elements of Marx’s thinking, of…

ByByNews on SantoshHub Jul 25, 2026

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top